February 22, 2018

Digital experiences while reading

Oooh, I do love literary and publishing spats! 

It's a bit of a worry though when Arnaud Nourry, CEO of one of the world's biggest publishing conglomerates, Hachette, comes out swinging against e-books. 


This from The Guardian:


"... The ebook is a stupid product. It is exactly the same as print, except it’s electronic. There is no creativity, no enhancement, no real digital experience."


To be followed by this rebuttal by author Erin Kelly, also from The Guardian:


"Nourry claims there is no digital experience. Isn’t that the point? If it’s got graphics, noise or animation, it’s no longer a book – it’s a computer game or a movie. Just as I write disconnected from the internet and in silence, I don’t want my books to do other stuff. The beauty of the book, in a world of digital noise, is the purity of the reading experience – and there’s nothing stupid about that."


Are we raising a generation of book-readers who can't just read un-enhanced words and must be endlessly entertained or dazzled at the same time? Why does everything have to have a digital angle these days?


For a long time, I've wondered how students can study and absorb serious concepts while plugged into loud music or working in noisy environments. I'm not one of those writers who needs background music. I can best focus my mind without any distractions at all, but then I was raised in a different era, so either I'm lucky or disadvantaged depending on your point of view. In fact, I'm actually one of those sad folk who turns the radio down in the car when I'm travelling a route I haven't been before, in order to concentrate exactly on where I'm going!


As to e-books, I find them ideal for fiction: thrillers, bestsellers, romantic sagas, etc - books you will only ever read once. They are no good at all for non-fiction or anything that has maps, photos, illustrations, footnotes or indexes. You can't flip backwards and forwards easily with e-books but, on the plus side, I love the ease of transport, the lightness, the built-in dictionary and as my eyesight diminishes with age, also the ability to change the font and page size (as Erin Kelly says in her article).


Check out these 35 Funniest Cartoons on Ebook Friendly, all hilarious.  This one by Tom Gauld is my favourite - I can't wait to try absorbing the next Dan Brown novel by odourless gas ...

















January 16, 2018

Can it be? Has the Girl grown up?



Although I've been absent for a while due to family issues, I've still been keeping an eye on the ironies in the world of books and publishing.

Can it truly be - that the next big thing in those infernal "Girl" books actually features a "Woman" in the title? What happened? Is publishing growing up or something?

Article here about The Woman in the Window from The Guardian. 

And which also goes to prove that if any debut author wants to get their Girl or Woman novel start a bidding frenzy, it doesn't hurt to have this in their CV ... "senior editor at the New York publishing house, William Morrow. Prior to that he had been the publisher of the British mass-market crime imprint Sphere ..."

The title isn't completely original though ... 








And not forgetting the original movie of that name!












September 29, 2017

When not doing social media is cool


Hm, interesting article in The Guardian about the tres cool  Zadie Smith who doesn't do social media because she wants to "retain the right to be wrong" and not be called to account over it.


Zadie Smith by Risko (Vanity Fair)

At least she was really lucky to get recognition and establish her career in the years before it became mandatory to flog oneself mercilessly on social media until you draw blood (mostly your own).

All new writers are endlessly harped at by book publishers, agents, creative writing teachers and other well meaning friends to be "out there" networking on social media, even if it can be counter-productive in too many cases. The current approach is that if you haven't got at least a thousand plus followers on your blog, or Twitter or Facebook, you are unworthy of being taken seriously as a writer, even if many of those followers are serial spammers or even a bunch of bots.

Although I'm on social media and I do appreciate its pluses in being able to reunite with old friends or have a laugh at cute kitten videos or support causes I care about, its many minuses have forced me to be low-key. I have the odd flurry of posting comments but have learned not to get involved or respond too quickly to controversial topics or moralising and posturing from either the extreme left or right trying to tell me what I ought to be thinking. (I am a bit over those rainbow-hued avatars at the moment.)

Here are some social media cartoons that hit the nail on the head for me :-

















My favourite! [or sic. favorite]

... and a whole bunch more here on this Pinterest page.













September 14, 2017

Judge thyself on book covers

A reader-writer email newsletter has a link to a site that presents you with images of book covers and gets you to give them a stars score out of five and compares your results to those as voted by Goodreads readers.

Some were quite good, most average, and none of them would induce me to drop everything and rush across to the other side of the store or library to investigate whether I wanted to read the book itself.

My score?  Bad. At "48% accuracy", it seems I have have failed the test and have nothing in common with Goodreads readers.

Absolutely nothing impresses you.
If Michelangelo himself painted these
covers you'd still say 'meh.'
Thumbs down.

No surprises - admittedly I'm not a candidate for any book with Justin Bieber on the cover for a start - although I did gasp at a couple of truly ghastly romance titles on which Goodreaders readers gave high scores. 

Here's the link. Have fun! 





July 08, 2017

Girls in the Dark

Previously I've grumbled about the overuse of "Girl" in titles, yet it's a juggernaut that never stops and they keep getting rolled out by publishers week after week. In fact, I'm currently reading one for a future online review plus I have two more in my general reading pile but only because their plot-lines captured my interest enough to overlook their girly titles.

Sigh. I accept defeat.

It's also getting "Dark" out there with two out of nine new titles in the latest crime newsletter from Allen & Unwin being The Dark Lake and The Dark Side. Is this the next trend?

"Dark" often features in titles of fantasy, ghost and horror stories, and I imagine just like "Girl" can be a nightmare (no puns intended) for bookshop owners and librarians: Can't remember the exact name, but it's got 'Dark' in the title" ... so I got to thinking whether novels might work with more imaginative alternative words for "Dark" and I looked up the word on thesaurus.com. (Thesaurus.com is a great way to waste time but also learn a thing or two.) 

Apart from basic Black, there are quite a few options. Would you be tempted by books called The Atramentous Road, The Obfuscous Garden, The Crepuscular Sea or The Tenebrous Way ? Probably not.

And, yup, there are a few novels called Girl in the Dark. (Obviously, you would have to be careful calling your novel The Dark Girl due to possible racist connotations.)

Perhaps you could try The Girl from the Dark. Or The Aphotic Girl, The Cimmerian Girl or The Stygian Girl (probably the best of the bunch)

I also looked up other words for "Girl". All tame or clunky. "Gyrle" might work in fantasy or medieval historical fiction. "Virgin" has all sorts of issues best left alone.

How about The Young Lady on the Train or Gone Lassie ? The latter might appeal to dog owners. But The Damsel on the Locomotive might get somebody excited.


From Akihabara
Love the cadence in this. Maybe we need more titles in Turkish?

The original and the best!



May 19, 2017

A'tishoo A'tishoo, we all fall down

Here is a new clutch of repetitive book titles. 

The old nursery rhyme Ring a Ring o'Roses  etc ... has numerous versions and hotly-debated origins, including that it may have something to do with some long-ago plague in which you sneezed, then went round and round, fell down and croaked. 

After spinning around all the huge number of books that include variations of the last phrase  - All Fall Down, We All Fall Down and  They All Fall Down - I feel ready to fall in a heap myself. (And this doesn’t include all the movies, music albums, poems or songs as well, but there are an awful lot of them from kids’ music to folksy to “explicit” hip hop.) 

So here are just a few random covers of the many books with falling-down titles - quite a number of self-published efforts, plus the odd one to do with drugs or unstable architecture. (Please note clicking on these images takes you nowhere and if interested in any of them you can do your own investigative Googling.)


Yup, all that going round and round ...
This is a pretty cool cover!

Same book, different edition













A really early one from the 1960s










So yet again this is a plea to all authors and publishers out there: you’ve invested all your blood, sweat, tears into writing and publishing your fabulous book but have failed to find a title that will give it the edge in a highly competitive market. It is really worth going that extra mile or two to find one that stands out.

Similar advice here from wiseinkblog and this general list from Goodreads is worth browsing for stand-out titles that we all know well. Just a word of caution; don’t make your title too long because that makes it a bit hard to remember.

On the other hand, though, if you’re aged about 8 or 9, you will find any title featuring Captain Underpants highly memorable. I mean, who could possibly forget a book called Captain Underpants and the Invasion of the Incredibly Naughty Cafeteria Ladies from Outer Space (and the Subsequent Assault of the Equally Evil Lunchroom Zombie Nerds)? 







April 17, 2017

Too many books

If you have ever wondered how many books have been published in the world since printing began, you would be set an impossible task, although that doesn't stop some folk from trying to estimate the figure.

This post from Mental Floss figures that last year (2016) there were 134,021,533 books in existence! And here is the link to the Book Statistics from UNESCO with a running total that makes little sense as it will be seen that many countries' statistics have not been updated for 25+ years. 

Trying to imagine so many books makes the mind boggle. I wonder how high that TBR (to be read) pile might stretch - to the moon and back perhaps?


These images pretty well sum up what happens to nearly all books: how quickly this year’s best-seller or prize-winning book will be relegated to a cave or a pit and become just another layer in the archaeology.




Cave of Forgotten Books, copyright Martin Geupe

Master of the Books, copyright Waldemar Bartkowiak